<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Geir Andersen - Rough edges &#187; Compact</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geirandersen.com/category/compact/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geirandersen.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 18:14:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Photo 14.01.2007</title>
		<link>http://www.geirandersen.com/2007/01/photo-14012007/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geirandersen.com/2007/01/photo-14012007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 19:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geir Andersen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Compact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PhotoBlog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geirandersen.com/2007/01/photo-14012007/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No Title


Ã‚Â I&#8217;m no photographer, and it shows in what I shoot. I&#8217;m still waiting for my DSLR, so just a few &#8220;nonsense&#8221; tests with my HP M525 compact digital.
I created a new &#8220;version&#8221; of the extension I built, and this image was taken using that. It&#8217;s simply a piece of a pipe and theÃ‚Â lens from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center">No Title<br />
<img id="image39" alt="PhotoBlog 14.01.2007" src="http://www.geirandersen.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/pb140107.jpg" /></p>
<p><span id="more-38"></span></p>
<p>Ã‚Â I&#8217;m no photographer, and it shows in what I shoot. I&#8217;m still waiting for my DSLR, so just a few &#8220;nonsense&#8221; tests with my HP M525 compact digital.<br />
I created a new &#8220;version&#8221; of the extension I built, and this image was taken using that. It&#8217;s simply a piece of a pipe and theÃ‚Â lens from a magnifying glass, put together and used in front of the compact.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve decreased the brightness of the upper left corner of the flower, using PhotoShop. Was a lucky/unlucky situation the whole picture. Just shooting a lot of tests, and this happened to be one of them. The flash created a nice (at least I think so) halo effect, but also sort of burnt out the white part of that group of flowers.</p>
<p>Like mentioned I&#8217;m still very rough, and the shots leave a lot to be desired.<br />
This has however sort of grown on my, and I&#8217;m actually quite keen on it. As I am very new, composition and lighting etc, etc&#8230; still bothers me, so I&#8217;m not keen on posting. But, I want to get better, and have a &#8220;record&#8221; of the progress, if any.</p>
<p>Should you happen to stumble upon this site, feel free to leave a comment on this. I can take most anything, as long as it&#8217;s somewhat constructive.</p>
<p>
<!-- Begin Google Adsense code -->
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-2350892913627659";
google_ad_width = 300;
google_ad_height = 250;
google_ad_format = "300x250_as";
google_ad_type = "text";
google_ad_channel = "";
google_color_border = "CCCCCC";
google_color_bg = "FFFFFF";
google_color_link = "0000FF";
google_color_text = "000000";
google_color_url = "008000";
//--></script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
<!-- End Google Adsense code -->
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geirandersen.com/2007/01/photo-14012007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Compact and Macro</title>
		<link>http://www.geirandersen.com/2007/01/digital-compact-and-macro/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geirandersen.com/2007/01/digital-compact-and-macro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geir Andersen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Compact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DIY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macro]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geirandersen.com/2007/01/digital-compact-and-macro/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update: I&#8217;ve changed host and images in this post is gone. Not that important post, so I haven&#8217;t been bothered recreating the images. (Leave a comment if you&#8217;d like to see, and I&#8217;ll make the effort.)
As I&#8217;ve posted, I recently bought the HP Photosmart M525, compact digital. This camera has a adequate macro setting, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update: I&#8217;ve changed host and images in this post is gone. Not that important post, so I haven&#8217;t been bothered recreating the images. (Leave a comment if you&#8217;d like to see, and I&#8217;ll make the effort.)<br />
As I&#8217;ve posted, I recently bought the <a href="http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/document?docname=c00821556&amp;lc=en&amp;cc=us&amp;dlc=en&amp;product=1147856&amp;lang=en" title="Product Specifications at HP.com" target="_blank">HP Photosmart M525</a>, compact digital. This camera has a adequate macro setting, and this was the main reason for my selection. (That and the fact it&#8217;s a good camera priced at under 1000NOK/$160.) The macro-setting probably isn&#8217;t real macro, and focusing once in macro isn&#8217;t easy, as the autofocus doesn&#8217;t always take your point&#8230; (Image on the right is resized and cropped.)</p>
<p>A few tests here at home has revealed that for really good macro shots, this camera won&#8217;t be enough. You need a good DSLR system, but my economy doesn&#8217;t allow for this at the moment. Thinking of a way to &#8220;work around&#8221; this limitation, got me a bit closed. I&#8217;m still very new to photography, so composition, focus (allthough it&#8217;s AF), lighting, etc.. is probably going to be bad, but you&#8217;ll hopefully get the idea.</p>
<p><span id="more-34"></span></p>
<p>
<!-- Begin Google Adsense code -->
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-2350892913627659";
google_ad_width = 300;
google_ad_height = 250;
google_ad_format = "300x250_as";
google_ad_type = "text";
google_ad_channel = "";
google_color_border = "CCCCCC";
google_color_bg = "FFFFFF";
google_color_link = "0000FF";
google_color_text = "000000";
google_color_url = "008000";
//--></script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
<!-- End Google Adsense code -->
</p>
<p><a href="http://www.geirandersen.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/diye4.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.geirandersen.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/diye4.thumbnail.jpg" id="image32" title="Ext 4" alt="Ext 4" align="right" /></a>This image was taken at the widest focal length (6mm) and as close as I could possibly get and also focus. (Click thumbnail to see a larger version.)</p>
<p><img src="http://www.geirandersen.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/diyestart.jpg" id="image33" title="Ext start" alt="Ext start" align="left" />I&#8217;ve dabbled with a lot of different things in my life, and I have a few bits &amp; pieces lying around. One of which was a sort of magnifying glass, seen depicted on the left. This magnifies the subject 8 times, but has no focusing abilities. For focusing you have to change the distance to the subject.</p>
<p>The working part of this, is actually only the ring on the top (in black). I pried this out using a flat-head screwdriver, making sure not to scratch the glass.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.geirandersen.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/diye3.jpg" id="image31" title="Ext 3" alt="Ext 3" align="right" height="162" width="172" />After getting the lens (with the plastic ring), I put a ring of cardboard around it. (Used the type you find in kitchen-paper.) Had to do this, to make a snug fit inside another cardboard tube I found lying around. The tube was almost a perfect fit around the lens of my compact. A bit of tape inside (on the right part of this image), and it fit just right.</p>
<p>Two more shots below. &#8220;Tube&#8221; as seen from the top and bottom.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.geirandersen.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/diye2.jpg" id="image30" alt="Ext 2" />  <img src="http://www.geirandersen.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/diye1.jpg" id="image29" alt="Ext 1" /></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had this magnifying glass for years, and I haven&#8217;t taken good care of it at all. The glass is dirty and a bit scratched, but I found it good enough for tests.</p>
<p align="left">Click on the thumbnails below, to see the fullsize versions.<br />
(Cropped, but retained 100% size, as it comes from the camera.)</p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.geirandersen.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/bpenfull2.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.geirandersen.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/bpenfull2.thumbnail.jpg" id="image28" alt="Ballpoint Pen 100% cropped" height="96" width="116" /></a> <a href="http://www.geirandersen.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/bpenfull1.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.geirandersen.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/bpenfull1.thumbnail.jpg" id="image27" alt="Ballpoint Pen 100%  cropped" height="87" width="128" /></a></p>
<p align="left">After making this and testing, I found an article at photocritic.org, <a href="http://www.photocritic.org/2006/adding-threading-to-compact-cameras/#more-227" title="Article at PhotoCritic.org" target="_blank">link to article</a>. This made me revise my own &#8220;design&#8221;, but I haven&#8217;t had a chance to make it yet.</p>
<p align="left">When I use the one I made, I have to have at least 50% zoom, in order to not see the ring of the glass. This makes the focusing harder, and could be changed rather easily. If I take ideas from the article at photocritic, and instead of a filter I add magnifying lenses. This will still be a cheap-as-chips solution, and the quality of the images is uncertain, but it&#8217;s a good test, as it&#8217;ll teach me more about photography as I work.</p>
<p align="left">I don&#8217;t know if anyone will read this, but if you do, feel free to leave a comment of what you think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geirandersen.com/2007/01/digital-compact-and-macro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
